pseudoscientific$65073$ - определение. Что такое pseudoscientific$65073$
Diclib.com
Словарь ChatGPT
Введите слово или словосочетание на любом языке 👆
Язык:

Перевод и анализ слов искусственным интеллектом ChatGPT

На этой странице Вы можете получить подробный анализ слова или словосочетания, произведенный с помощью лучшей на сегодняшний день технологии искусственного интеллекта:

  • как употребляется слово
  • частота употребления
  • используется оно чаще в устной или письменной речи
  • варианты перевода слова
  • примеры употребления (несколько фраз с переводом)
  • этимология

Что (кто) такое pseudoscientific$65073$ - определение

FORM OF PSEUDO-SCHOLARSHIP
Pseudoscientific Language Comparison; Pseudo-scientific language comparison

Pseudoscientific language comparison         
Pseudoscientific language comparison is a form of pseudo-scholarship that has the objective of establishing historical associations between languages by naïve postulations of similarities between them.
List of food faddists         
  • [[Alfred W. McCann]]
  • [[August Engelhardt]]
  • [[Benedict Lust]]
  • [[Dan Dale Alexander]]
  • [[Emmet Densmore]]
  • [[George J. Drews]]
  • [[Gustav Schlickeysen]]
  • [[Horace Fletcher]]
  • [[Isaac Jennings]]
  • [[Johanna Brandt]]
  • [[Lelord Kordel]]
  • [[Paul Bragg]]
  • [[Sylvester Graham]]
  • [[William Howard Hay]]
WIKIMEDIA LIST ARTICLE
Pseudoscientific diet advocates; Food faddists
Food faddists (also known as pseudoscientific diet advocates) are people who promote fad diets or pseudoscientific dieting ideas. The following people are recognized as notable food faddists, either currently or historically.
List of topics characterized as pseudoscience         
WIKIMEDIA LIST ARTICLE
List of quasi-scientific speculative ideas; List of speculative or fringe theories; List of alternative, speculative and disputed sciences; List of alternative, speculative and disputed theories; List of alternative, speculative, and disputed theories; List of pseudosciences; List of alternative, disputed, and speculative theories; List of Pseudoscientific Theories; List of pseudoscientific theories; List of pseudosciences and pseudoscientific topics; List of fields or concepts that have been labeled as pseudosciences and pseudoscientific; List of pseudosciences and pseudoscientific concepts; Glossary of pseudoscience; List of topics characterised as pseudoscience; List of pseudoscience topics; Pseudopsychology; List of pseudoscientific religious beliefs; List of religious beliefs characterized as pseudoscience; List of pseudoscientific topics; Pseudoscientific topics; Pseudophysics; Pseudoscience (physics)
This is a list of topics that have, either currently or in the past, been characterized as pseudoscience by academics or researchers. Detailed discussion of these topics may be found on their main pages.

Википедия

Pseudoscientific language comparison

Pseudoscientific language comparison is a form of pseudo-scholarship that aims at establishing historical associations between languages by naïve postulations of similarities between them.

While comparative linguistics also studies the historical relationships of languages, linguistic comparisons are deemed pseudoscientific when they are not based on the established practices. Pseudoscientific language comparison is usually performed by people with little or no specialization in the field of comparative linguistics. It is a widespread type of linguistic pseudoscience.

The most common method applied in pseudoscientific language comparisons is to search two or more languages for words that seem similar in their sound and meaning. While such similarities often seem convincing to laypeople, linguistic scientists see this kind of comparison as unreliable for two primary reasons. First, the method applied is not well-defined: the criterion of similarity is subjective and thus not subject to verification or falsification, which is contrary to the principles of the scientific method. Second, the large size of all languages' vocabulary makes it easy to find coincidentally similar words between languages.

Because of its unreliability, the method of searching for isolated similarities is rejected by nearly all comparative linguists (however, see mass comparison for a controversial method that operates by similarity). Instead of noting isolated similarities, comparative linguists use a technique called the comparative method to search for regular (i.e. recurring) correspondences between the languages' phonology, grammar and core vocabulary in order to test hypotheses of relatedness.

Certain types of languages seem to attract much more attention in pseudoscientific comparisons than others. These include languages of ancient civilizations such as Egyptian, Etruscan or Sumerian; language isolates or near-isolates such as Basque, Japanese and Ainu; and languages that are unrelated to their geographical neighbors such as Hungarian.